Metadata
A minimal foundation, deliberately thin
Dublin Core is a set of fifteen description elements — title, creator, subject, description, publisher, contributor, date, type, format, identifier, source, language, relation, coverage, rights — standardised as ISO 15836.
Its thinness is a choice. It never aimed to describe an object in detail; it aimed to let any system understand the essentials of a resource without knowing the domain. It is the smallest common denominator of documentary description.
What it brings to a photo collection
- Immediate interoperability. A harvester, a portal, an institutional repository can read Dublin Core with no prior negotiation.
- A starting discipline. The fifteen elements make a good checklist: if you can’t fill in
creator,date, andrights, your description isn’t ready. - A safe exit point. Even if your internal model is rich, being able to project it into Dublin Core guarantees a third party can always get something out of it.
Its limits, worth knowing before committing
Dublin Core cannot express what makes a photographic collection specific: the degree of certainty of an attribution, the distinction between a work and a print, an edition of 3/8, a chain of provenance, a printing process.
That isn’t a flaw, it’s its scope. So a heritage collection needs a richer internal model — LIDO 1.1 or CIDOC CRM for museum exchange — and uses Dublin Core as a surface projection, not as a working model.
The common mistake
Filling in Dublin Core by hand, as a separate form. That’s work wasted twice: entry is redundant, and the two sets diverge at the first omission.
Dublin Core should be derived from your internal description, not typed alongside it.
In practice
- Use the fifteen elements as a completeness checklist.
- Describe in a rich model, and project to Dublin Core on export.
- Prioritise
identifier,rights, andcreator: the most commonly missing and the most expensive to reconstruct. - For an institutional deposit, plan for LIDO or CIDOC CRM as well.
Obscura Flow describes against a full heritage model — work, print, attribution, provenance — and exports to LIDO 1.1 and CIDOC CRM; Dublin Core-style elements are derived from it rather than retyped.